Amnesiac (CD)
"Faced with a deliberately difficult deviation into 'experimentation,' Radiohead and its record label promoted Kid A as just that -- a brave experiment, and that the next album, which was just around the corner, really, would be the 'real' record, the one to satiate fans looking for the next OK Computer, or at least guitars. At the time, people bought the myth, especially since live favorites like 'Knives Out' and 'You and Whose Army?' were nowhere to be seen on Kid A. That, however, ignores a salient point -- Amnesiac, as the album came to be known, consists of recordings made during the Kid A sessions, so it essentially sounds the same. Since Radiohead designed Kid A as a self-consciously epochal, genre-shattering record, the songs that didn't make the cut were a little simpler, so it shouldn't be a surprise that Amnesiac plays like a streamlined version of Kid A, complete with blatant electronica moves and production that sacrifices songs for atmosphere. This, inevitably, will disappoint the legions awaiting another guitar-based record (that is, after all, what they were explicitly promised), but what were they expecting? This is an album recorded at the same time and Radiohead has a certain reputation to uphold. It would be easier to accept this if the record was better than it is. Where Kid A had shock on its side, along with an admirably dogged desire to not be conventional, Amnesiac often plays as a hodgepodge. True, it's a hodgepodge with amazing moments: the hypnotic sway of 'Pyramid Song' and 'You and Whose Army?,' the swirling 'I Might Be Wrong,' 'Knives Out,' and the spectacular closer 'Life in a Glasshouse,' complete with a drunkenly swooning brass band. But, these are not moments that are markedly different than Kid A, which itself lost momentum as it sputtered to a close. And this is the main problem -- though it's nice for an artist to be generous and release two albums, these two records clearly derive from the same source and have the same flaws, which clearly would have been corrected if they had been consolidated into one record. Instead of revealing why the two records were separated, the appearance of Amnesiac makes the separation seem arbitrary -- there's no shift in tone, no shift in approach, and the division only makes the two records seem unfocused, even if the best of both records is quite stunning, proof positive that Radiohead are one of the best bands of their time." --Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide
| Peter Pendergrass
- Greensboro, NC, USA |
| This was my first Radiohead album, bought in 6th grade, 2001, and it totally changed my life. When you buy this CD, you shouldn't expect a revelation (unless you're young and impressionable), but you should expect a sprawling, intense, and complete collection on songs that you can listen to pretty much anytime and get chills. I'm trying to be unbiased, but this album is just... indescribable. It's not leftovers of Kid A; disregard the official synopsis under the "Buy Now" button. Amnesiac is, like all other Radiohead albums, a completely separate being entirely. Kid A was experimental electronica rock. Amnesiac is much more than an experiment. If anything, these songs only had more time to develop between the Kid A sessions and the release of this album in 2001. Think of Amnesiac as the grown-up version of Kid A (A for "Amnesiac"), stronger, more mature, and more intelligent. | |
| Ian Feng
- Austin, TX, US |
| So the word on the street is that "Amnesiac" should have been called "Kid B". Well the word is right. Instead of the tightly structured and thematically unified sound that is "Kid A", "Amnesiac" is a rambling mess, and not rambling in the good sense either. There are no songs here that approach the highs of "Kid A" (like the brilliantly shambling "National Anthem") though the somber "Pyramid Song" and the faux-Nawlins funeral march of "Life in a Glass House" comes close, and the lows are much much worse than even "Treefingers" - see if you will ever listen to "Hunting Bears" all the way through after the first time. Nothing, however, compares to the disaster that is "Morning Bell (Amnesiac)". An utterly lifeless retread of the creepy original, this is the only Radiohead I can actually say that I hate. Hate! | |
| Erin Gray
- Seattle , WA, USA |
| Kid A+ is how anyone should view this. Not so much a concept album as Kid A felt like. Radiohead is reaching beyond the normal barriers of music. This album will be emulated by other bands for the coming decade in exactly the way that Kid A can never be emulated. What noone seems to notice is that the music comes along with genuine original art. Beck and Bjork are the only other musicians on the face of the earth who are making music in the same genre stretching manner. | |
| Eric Flynt
- Hattiesburg, MS, USA |
| Yesterday I did what I should have done with Kid A. Instead of tearing Amnesiac open and listening to it on my way home, I waited, laid down on the couch, put on my headphones, cranked up the cd, and closed my eyes. And I was blown away. It took me 10 listens to Kid A before I appreciated it this much. Only complete concentration can show you how truly great this album is (ditto Kid A). This isn't background music with catchy melodies to bob your head to while doing something else. This is genius. Radiohead's not God, but they're as close to a savior as Rock's gonna' get. | |
| J-Tooth
- Chapel Hill, , USA |
| Although Amnesiac has a few shining moments, it doesn't seem to be as tight or cohesive as Kid A. I believe the songs on Amnesiac would be much better received on a series of eps. | |
| Curtis Killian
- uncasville, CT, USA |
| I think that Amnesiac is an album to grow on you. I was a huge fan of Kid A, and although I believe the new one is good, it sounds like a lot of the songs are Kid A rejects. But it will probably grow on me... I also didn't realize there was a limited edition album like Kid A. i bought it at walmart, and there were no limited editions there.. Anybody know what stores to get a limited edition one, please email. THanks,
Curtis | |
| Ryan
- waterloo, IA, USA |
| Amnesiac is a very good album. The only thing I find deficient is the structure of the album. It didn't seem to flow together as an album as compared to OK Computer and Kid A. Other than that I find it enjoyable, well made, and a breath of fresh air from everything that dominates today's music charts. | |
| Kaleb
- Lynchburg, VA, USA |
| For the few others before myself, who may feel that acts such as the Strokes, (terrible band & name), will save rock, RADIOHEAD are still the masters of the game. Great album! -'There are trap doors, from which you can never return'. | |
| A Buhr
- St. Paul, MN, USA |
| I was pretty disappointed in this album. I'm an "OK Computer" lover who also really enjoyed "Kid A". "Amnesiac" lacks the tight little rhythms and other touches present in the previous album. Aside from two tracks, I find it boring. | |
| Michelle Martin
- Nashville, TN, USA |
| I have never felt as good as I did tonight driving around listening to these songs. The beer was good, the party was good, Otha Turner was geat but this band made my night. | |
| Justin Kennedy
- , , USA |
|
Despite what people may believe, Radiohead isn't God. To all those people out there who would think that 13 tracks of non-stop vomitting and car horns is greatness, harvest the crust from your eyes. I'm not saying that the newest medium from Radiohead is anything like that, I think most of it is beautiful, I'm just sick of these devoted fans out there who think that whatever an artist puts out, is the next Venus in Furs... if you don't agree with me, good for you... thank you. | |